Dear residents of Trumbull:
Three years ago, I said in my farewell remarks that it had been my great honor to serve you as first selectman for eight years. I wished our new first selectman, Tim Herbst, well and I promised to support him in whatever way I could.
Then I left the public stage and moved on with my life. Unfortunately, Tim Herbst has not moved on.
A few days ago, Mr. Herbst wrote a letter to the town calling the North Nichols sewer project “ill-conceived.” He said that it should never have been started “given all of the problems associated with Contract 3 Jog Hill.” And he stated that the residents of North Nichols were “lied to” about the cost of the project.
These are strong words. To describe a 2002 estimate of assessment costs and the disclosures we made at that time a “lie” is absurd and duplicitous and suggests Mr. Herbst has some other agenda in mind. This inflammatory language, added to the other accusations he’s made over the last three years, indicates that since he took office, Mr. Herbst has been more interested in trying to embarrass me, and my administration, than he is in attempting to bring a swift completion to this project and others.
Let me clarify the record.
- Bonding authorization for the North Nichols project occurred in the fall of 2009. Support was bipartisan across all boards. The Board of Finance and the Water Pollution Control Authority had an opportunity to vet all aspects of this project and decided unanimously to proceed. The Town Council also supported the project with a vote that was unanimous save one abstention.
- The construction phase of the project was done nearly entirely under Mr. Herbst’s watch. If he had concerns about the construction, he has had every opportunity to fix them as they occurred. He hired an oversight firm, Tighe & Bond, and promised the work of that firm would pay for itself. To date, the town has spent $2 million-plus for the work this firm has performed. It is not apparent to date that the projected savings have been realized.
- In my judgment, the town could have hired one or two project engineers at less than $100,000 each. It would have allowed the same level of oversight at a much-reduced cost, but that was his decision to make.
Now let me address Mr. Herbst’s actions.
- The first selectman is arbitrarily removing $10 million in costs from the North Nichols sewer project to the town side of the budget without WPCA, Board of Finance or Town Council approval.
- If those costs are non-sewer-related, then they should never have been allocated to the project in the first place.
- This project has been going on for three years now. If there were $10 million in non-sewer-project costs that were identified and paid for from the WPCA project, why, then, were they never brought before the Town Council and Board of Finance for authorization and approval?
First Selectman Herbst has had complete control of the WPCA and Town Council for these three years and has had ample time to address any perceived or real deficiencies in this project. Although I am no longer in public office, I still care very much about the people whose lives and livelihood my decisions affected. Notwithstanding the inflammatory comments Mr. Herbst has made about me, if there is any way I can help to resolve these issues, I stand ready to do so. In the past three years, I’ve never been asked.
I wish all Trumbull residents a happy holiday season and prosperous new year.
Ray Baldwin, former First Selectman
Next Herbst will accuse Bladwin of the debacle concerning Michael Bolton.
Teflon Tim is at it again . . .
Vietnam Vet, Police Officer, Dad going to night school for a law degree, EMS community service, all before becoming a politican. Tim- Law school, politican. HS commencement speech, let's meet at 1600 PA Ave. Who do Americans distrust more than used car salesmen? And that's all he ever wanted to be. That's all you need to know.
We miss you.....
Over 2 million for T&B. Congratulations, Tr. taxpayers, we ALL get to share in this Titanic $$ mess - or so says the FS without approval from the necessary town boards. Kinda sounds like Egypt's new pharoah . . . Then there's all those lost seats for Trumbull students in the Magnet School - along with a piece of Trumbull that got given away in that memorable deal (but we got the chance to buy gasoline soaked property.) Then there's the 1M. we would have received for the Magnet School - gone. Then there's all those atty's we have employed; also, consultants out the wazoo; and high tech phones for employees; bonded road work . . . The final indignity? Our FS telling the POTUS that Trumbull is like 'Mayberry!' But keep your eye on your tax bill and keep ignoring everything else. . .
Last years tax increase was hidden by the revaluation of property. Most homeowners lost value on their property around 20%. Since property taxes are tied to the assessed value of the property, your taxes should have declines 20% to be consistent. They did not, in fact, tax payments declined by around 5% for some and less for others and in some cases taxes soared by 10% (since their property lost less value). So, if you property declined 20% and your taxes declined 5%, you were hit with a 15% tax increase. People don't really understand that but they were hit with one of the biggest tax increases in history. This can be seen in higher personal property taxes on your cars etc. Further, you may have been hit by other "hidden" taxes, such as the "new" calculation for water useage put forward by the Republican WPCA that cost sewer useage fees to skyrocket. Fees for services at Town Hall increased over the past 3 years as has, I believe, "Pay for Play" if you are a parent. Those are facts...check it out.
Last years' school budget was fair except for one glaring exception, that is the funding mechanism for FDK (Full Day Kindergarten). That should have been in the budget, not some gimmick funding. Nevertheless, that not withstanding last year was fair and I hope this year is fair as well and that FDK is funded with the corrcect funding methodology, that is, in the budget where it belongs. Further, I hope in 2013 we elect a school board that understands it role, that is, to discuss how to make our system better within fiscal reason. These so callled "fiscal conservatives" should run for the BOF or the Town Council where such "political talk" is both appropriate and necessary. The School Board should offer a budget that is fact based, and conservative but opens discussion on how we get better now and in the future. Let the politicians, FS, BOF and TC determine what we can afford as is the proper check and balance. We used to have this until the Democrats (my Party) made it bad by having a 4-3 spilt and the Republicans made it worse with the dumb Charter Revision. Elect people for the BOE who know what they are talking about not political windbags. Tom Tesoro