2 Trumbull Residents Call for Special Election

In a lawsuit they allege the town violated rules about posting resignations and say town officials conspired to prevent a special election after a Board of Finance member resigned recently.

David Rutigiano
David Rutigiano

A resignation on the Board of Finance has sparked a lawsuit calling for a special election.

According to resident Vicki Tesoro, one of the plaintiffs, "What's going on here is a carefully orchestrated campaign to deny Trumbull citizens a voice in electing a replacement for David Rutigliano. It's politics before people, and it's political gamesmanship versus the right of the people to choose. This is a pervasive approach in [First Selectman] Tim Herbst's government, and we're putting them on notice that it's not acceptable."

Both Tesoro and resident Tom Kelly filed the suit. 

It started after Board of Finance Member David Rutigliano, also a republican state representative, resigned his seat on the Board of Finance Nov. 26.

The Town Clerk stamped it Nov. 27, the day before Thanksgiving. A special election can be started by petition if filed within 10 days, according to the Town Charter. Later, allegedly after that time span, First Selectman Tim Herbst appointed Republican William Haberlin to the seat.

Kelly and Tesoro contest when the 10 days began say the span is really 10 business days.

The pair said they tried to petition for an election after learning of the resignation in early December, only to be rejected by Town Clerk Suzanne Burr Monaco on Dec. 13. They said Monaco told them the deadline was Dec. 12.

The suit was filed on Dec. 27 in Bridgeport Superior Court. The first hearing is Jan. 13.

Monaco defended the decision, saying she followed all procedures and checked with the state.

"Upon receipt of Representative Rutigliano’s resignation, my office contacted the Town Attorneys as well as Ted Bromley from the Secretary of the State’s office to ensure that all actions taken in properly posting this resignation were in accordance with the Trumbull Town Charter and the Connecticut General Statutes. 

"My handling of this matter comported with the Trumbull Town Charter and followed the directions given by the Secretary of the State’s office and the Town Attorney. Only after ten days passed and after Mr. Haberlin was sworn into office did Mr. Kelly and Ms. Tesoro attempt to obtain special election petitions," she said.

Trumbull's town attorneys were not available for comment Tuesday.

But Kelly and Tesoro said Monaco should have made a public notification of the resignation sooner and that she miscounted the start of the 10-day period. State law also requires notification to the Secretary of State within five days, they added.

Beyond Politics

At a press conference Monday at the Helen Plumb building, Tesoro and Kelly, both Democrats, announced the suit, along with democrat Tony Silber.

But the matter transcends politics, Silber said. "[Voters] deserve a right to choose who's on the Board of Finance."

"We may end up losing, but at least the people will have a choice" if the suit is successful, Silber added.

Tesoro, who was recently re-elected to the Town Council, said she heard about the resignation Dec. 10, but that it should have been announced sooner. Another member of the Board of Finance, Andy Palo, said he did not know until the panel's meeting Dec. 12. 

Kelly was also elected to the Board of Finance in November.

Both plaintiffs also questioned the letter itself, in which both Herbst's and Rutigliano's names are misspelled.

Rutigliano said in his letter he's leaving to focus on his state representative seat. He also partly owns the SBC restaurant chain. 

"It has been a joy to serve on the board. I am confident it is in very capable hands," Rutigliano said.

The plaintiffs also asked why Rutigliano did not resign before the municipal election, to avoid the cost of a special election, and why he did not tell anyone else he resigned.

Finally, Kelly asked why the matter has been "shrouded in secrecy."

"What else is this administration hiding from the people in Trumbull?", Kelly asked. He also noted more meetings have been held in executive session. 

"[Herbst] promised unprecedented transparency," Kelly said. "It's a matter of principle worth fighting for."

Kathleen McGannon January 01, 2014 at 12:20 PM
According to the CT Post, Mr. Rutigliano resigned from the BOF upon being elected to the state seat. That is not true. Mr. Rutigliano has held onto the BOF seat for more that a year. He personally told me almost a year ago that he was staying "as a favor to Tim." He publicly stated at a BOF meeting that he would not have voted the way the BOF voted on 2 important issues, had he not been busy in Hartford. His votes would have resulted in a different outcome. That should have been his clue to give up that seat. It could have been filled during this past November's regular election. This has been an orchestrated attempt by the Herbst administration to slip this resignation through and appoint Mr. Herbst's choice to fill out the term. This seat needs to be filled by the people of Trumbull.
Jim Sullivan January 01, 2014 at 09:38 PM
As someone who always votes, it might be tough getting motivated for a lone BOF seat election. The cost and effort involved are difficult to justify to us taxpayers not "in the know." Having a vigorous opposition is generally a healthy condition, but sometimes you have to acknowledge a good chess move...if that's what this was...and move on. Just IMHO.
Thomas Tesoro January 02, 2014 at 09:53 AM
It would take about 10 special elections to equal the cost of the botched Michael Bolton Concert. The fact of the matter is that had Mr. Rutigliano resigned in a timely manner this position would have been on the November ballot. So, if Herbst really had any concern for the cost he would have made sure Rutigliano resigned so that a special election was unnecessary. This whole matter stinks. Mr. Rutigliano should have resigned once he was elected State Rep. Certainly he should have resigned so that this position could have been on the Novemebr Ballot. He did not. The timing of the resignation stinks. The fact that there has been little public notice stinks. This is cheap politics at the expense of the voters right to know and right to choose. I am sorry but it is time we hold our politicians to the same standards we apply to ourselves, that is, do the right thing.
louis January 02, 2014 at 10:52 PM
As many of you might know, those of you who have been exposed to State Politics, I have no 'need' of serving on a municipal board. As a former DNC employee, I know all too well that these commissions cause more trouble than they do good. But my extensive experience in finance and an understanding of state budgets (having worked during budget season at the State Capitol) I would be fantastic in getting the fiscal house of historic Trumbull together. As I said, I don't need a confidence boost especially for a non paid position (when I already received state-wide recognition for previous work on municipal government) therefore I most likely wouldn't stand for the role in the special election unless the people asked it of me.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »